5 Reasons Why Sirius XM Is at $0.43

8 Recommendations

Things aren't pretty in satellite radio.

Even as Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI) continues to gain subscribers and point to merger-related synergies, it's a hard sell on Wall Street. The company's stock begins the new trading week at $0.43 a share.

If there is any irony in the stock's erosion, it's that the bulls get more animated as the stock drops. Wait a few hours and you'll see the comment box below this article fill up with comments of readers incensed that The Motley Fool would dare bash their precious stock.

I am an adamant bull on the satellite radio medium -- though not necessarily the stock -- and I still get the venom.

"I'm no longer reading TMF," a typical comment may go. "You guys have been bashing Sirius for years."

There is never a "thank you for being right" or an "I wish I would've listened to you" after some of the sharper attacks on the company from my fellow Fools. I don't get it. Why are the befallen doing the taunting? We all make investing mistakes. They are inevitable. The key is to learn from them. Delusion will only make you poor.

Rather than fire up the bull or bear camps, I want to take an even-handed approach at the reasons why Sirius XM finds itself in its pocket change hole today. It's the best way of assessing if the company has what it takes to claw its way back out.

1. It's the shares outstanding
Sirius used to have a small count of shares outstanding. Then came its costly recapitalization efforts in 2003, followed by the necessary swallow of XM this summer. With more than 3 billion shares now, the company would have to command a market cap of $32 billion for its stock to break into the double digits.

Even DirecTV (NYSE: DTV) and Dish Network (Nasdaq: DISH) combined don't account for that kind of market cap, and satellite television is a higher-revenue product where both companies have been consistently profitable for years.

Trading in the single digits is a more realistic goal, but even then the industry will have to show that it's capable of generating consistent cash flow now that top-line growth is decelerating.

2. The FCC did it in
What stinks most about the FCC taking a year-and-a-half to approve the merger is where it dropped the newlyweds off: mere months from the first of three nine-figure debt repayment milestones.   

Starting in February, Sirius XM has three huge refinancing hurdles to clear. This is like re-spawning in a video game, only to realize that you're starting again in a barrage of enemy fire. This is like getting pumped that your friends threw you a surprise party, only to find that the cake has been spiked with arsenic.

If Sirius and XM had been able to milk their deal synergies a year ago, the new entity would be much closer to turning consistently cash flow positive and appeasing its creditors.

3. It's a lousy time for automakers to go weak
If you think last week's market hit was bad, tell that to someone who invested only in domestic automakers. Shares of General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Ford (NYSE: F) shed roughly half of their value last week.

A sour economy is brutal to a big-ticket industry like car manufacturers. Even though relief is coming from pesky gasoline prices, drivers are delaying new car purchases and spending less time on the road.

That's a one-two punch for satellite radio. Fewer new cars being sold means fewer satellite receivers out there, since factory-installed systems remain the key driver for the industry. Drivers resorting to public transportation or carpools to trim down their commuting costs lowers the value proposition of a satellite radio subscription.

4. The alternatives are real 
I have typically defended satellite radio relative to the booming popularity of portable media players like Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL) iPod because they each aim at replacing a different aural appliance. Apple upgrades a car's CD player, while XM and Sirius take old-school terrestrial radio to a new level.

However, times they are a-changing. Some of the more popular Apple apps for iPhone and iPod touch devices are Internet radio streamers like AOL Music, Last.fm, and music discovery site Pandora. When you follow the bread crumbs of nascent trends like in-car Wi-Fi connectivity, municipal broadband coverage clouds, and smartphones that double as Internet radio streaming gadgets, it's hard not to temper one's expectations of satellite radio itself.

5. Separating the stock from the sector
I'm convinced that satellite radio will survive. The market obviously isn't so sure about the immortality of Sirius XM Radio shareholders. After all, antsy creditors may force Sirius into bankruptcy reorganization next year. It would likely wipe out the common-stock investors.

Even if a terrestrial radio heavy like Clear Channel or CBS (NYSE: CBS) makes a buyout play, it's one that will be considerably cheaper in bankruptcy court.

I don't see it getting that far. Filing for reorganization would clean out investors, but it might also be Raisin Bran to the colons of subscribers. "Most consumers -- including Sirius and XM's 18.6 million subscribers -- don't know the difference between Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection," I wrote last month. "Subs hear the word 'bankruptcy,' and they cancel in droves. Potential signups hear 'bankruptcy,' and there's no way they'll fork over the money for a satellite radio receiver."

In other words, Sirius has far more to lose than its common shareowners if creditors force the company into bankruptcy.

All of these hurdles explain why the stock has been marked down to four bits. Clawing its way out is a matter of clearing a few of the obstacles in the coming months.

I think Sirius can do it, but don't let that get in the way of the venom that Sirius bulls will tack on at the end of this piece.

Some other tales of low-priced stocks on the move:

What do the unfolding financial crisis and ongoing market volatility mean for your money? The Fool's here with answers. Get the best of our daily commentary and analysis in your inbox simply by entering your email address in the box below.

Apple is an active recommendation for Stock Advisor subscribers. Learn more about the stocks with a free 30-day trial subscription.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is such a fan of satellite radio that he subscribes to both Sirius and XM. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:09 PM, DemianBohemian wrote: Report this Comment

    SIRI is not at .43 - it's at .51. Why were you guys pumping XM as a stand alone company up in the double digits all those years to your paid subscribers then? Day after day you fish for hits to your website with worthless articles about SIRI. You guys have a history of pumping stocks when they are overvalued and then bashing those same stocks when they are undervalued. Offer some worthwhile analysis for once, will you?

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Bartleby80 wrote: Report this Comment

    Is it possible Sirius XM can branch into new, untapped uses for their product? Their current trend seems so pig headed towards finding more and more of the same clunky ways to plod through their market share. With all the systems they have in place, are there alternative uses for this technology?

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:31 PM, buzzltyr wrote: Report this Comment

    Much of what you say I would agree with, concerning timing and the FCC, but fyi- The Ipod has been around for 5 years and has done no damge yet, Pandora is a much better case for BK, Municipal wide wifi is dead on arrival. It often seems the MF looks for everything that can be used to downgrade, even when it is false.

    And why is the most important thing NEVER mentioned. A recent quuote for Tom Leykis

    Maybe, but as talk-radio host Tom Leykis told the paper: "Even if he does have a smaller audience in terms of his cumulative audience, that won't last forever. Terrestrial radio is hemorrhaging audience as it tries to find its place in the Digital Age, while satellite is up tremendously."

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:32 PM, mzl0011 wrote: Report this Comment

    Most people do not know the technical capabilities of the satelites. The future method for delivering in car entertainment will be using Sirius Satellites. We will have Weather, News, Movie times, Gas prices, etc... in our cars. Sirius is not just a radio company. Wifi is free, but unbelievable amount of infrastructure will have to be built and ungodl amount of technical problems that would follow. Sirius is the future for cars, boats, planes, etc.... Ask any pilot or Mariner if they have Sirius XM weather.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:42 PM, dblh3l1x wrote: Report this Comment

    Thank you for being right.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:44 PM, gonzosnose wrote: Report this Comment

    My view on your 5 points:

    1) Most Sirius investors don't care about double-digit stock price at this point. I imagine the vast majority bought in under 4. If Sirius got to 7, most of us would be dancing in the streets.

    2) I agree that the FCC is one of the primary reasons SiriusXM is in the state it's currently in. But it wasn't a death blow. It'll take time, but sooner rather than later. You have to ask yourself why there were more congressional hearings on this merger than the Iraq war.

    3) The carmakers are a problem, but less so than the FCC. There are plenty of existing cars with satellite radios that have not been renewed. Once Sirius gives better subscription packages, you'll see old subscribers coming back in droves.

    4) The ipod is a complement to Sirius, NOT a substitute. How many people have more than 3 thousand songs on their Ipods? A lot less than the number who have 2,000 songs, max. Ipods get boring in cars. Sirius offers 1000 times more songs, talk, etc and gives Ipod users ideas for what new songs to download. Also, only the newer cars offer Ipod plug-in capacity -- as opposed to the special radio tuner that tries to find a clear FM station for an ipod. It works okay, but not great. Until every car has plug-ins for Ipods, Sirius will rule, and even then, people will go back and forth. So point 3 conflicts with point 4 by your own logic as far as your Ipod argument is concerned.

    5) Sirius = the satellite industry. You use too many "mays". This point is more hypothetical than factual. Creditors may be impressed with the synergies that'll grow before next year. Sirius may become the new rising phoenix (which it will). Nuff said. For now....

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:45 PM, TCsNicNac wrote: Report this Comment

    As for alternative uses for this technology, I had heard on the news a few months ago that the FAA was in talks with XM to develope and impliment a new air-traffic control system, using XM's satelites. The old system is undependable and obsolete. It could be that if that government contract comes to pass it will be a huge boost to this company. I also heard that a program may soon be available which would allow Sirius XM subscribers to use the IPhone as a reciever for the service. That would open up literally millions of new potential subscribers. Personally, I hate using CDs and services that are not live and connected to what's happening in the world. In case of an emergency, satelite radio would be capable of alerting the public. A third huge market for the technology is the live traffic navagation service. People are finding out in droves that a standard GPS unit is useless when a major problem occures on the road ahead. More and more people will be subscribing to the traffic warning capabilities offered by Sirius XM. There is plenty of potential and all that is needed is for the news to break that they are moving forward on one of these fronts. Keep the faith. I think you'll be glad you did.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:47 PM, ibEddy wrote: Report this Comment

    Why so sensitive? Why so foolish? I drive a minivan which has a large nonslip pad on the dash that holds a tablet, notebook, pocket pc, mp3 player, 8-track player, and text to speech system, and I use them all. The most useful one is the text-to-speech system which allows me to consume tons of technical information while driving to a job site via the internet. But the radio button always wins just because it doesn’t work me. All the other new pseudo radios would rather have me setup things, fill out surveys, download constant updates, and take me to places that I don’t want to go than make money. So why is it that even though I uninstalled all the Apple stuff it still wants me to update it?

    43 cents is a historically normal stock price for siri. The good news is that it has no problems recovering from a penny; in fact, siri mirrors these sharp falls with a steep and extended recovery. The last time it happened it was 38 cents to $7.5.

    Ed

    __&__

    / ____\

    | _____|

    | _ (o)(o)

    C ... ---_)

    | _| ___|

    | _\__/

    /_____\

    /_____/ \

    /_______ \

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:49 PM, sl6209 wrote: Report this Comment

    Well, Rick. What is there to say. At least you're not still spewing trash about reverse splits... Venom? Believe it dude, you and The Fool get everything you deserve. Let's just start with Bohemian's comment about pumping XM at double digits Rick? Why don't you spend some time justifying them @ 13, Rick. No, instead you're going to spew nonsense about a spec play not being able to reside in doubles. Rick, this article is a mess and you know it. I have to ask what universe you live in? Every point you made (as it relates to your premise about why a stock is .43--and you've been corrected--it's .51 so you're old news.) is invalid, Rick. Technicals and metrics a tthis stage Rick? Why do you just give "the deal" just a glancing blow without providing the real facts behind it? I don't know. Maybe you're just clueless, maybe you really don't know that the bondholders are shorting this stock to protect their convertible interests. Rick, I don't have time to educate you and get into all the particulars here with you, but please, do some HOMEWORK! You know, I almost felt a little sorry for you at the beginning of your article but by the time I got to the end, I was just as incensed as usual. Once again, nothing but drivel and nonsense. This may work for the average joe who happens by and knows nothing about the market, but c'mon Rick, you're just not being fair even to those people. I mean jeez, Rick, instead of saying something stupid like the downturn in autos will hurt SIRI because of volume, you should tell the truth and say that SIRI already has reported that downturn but that their SUBSCRIPTION ACTIVATION NUMBERS PER UNIT have offset that volume number Rick. I mean, the company reported that in their last Quarterly. C'mon Rick, where's the HOMEWORK. I need to see more homework from you dude. Pleaaaaase! Then maybe your articles will make sense. This one = WAY OFF BASE. Thank you.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 5:54 PM, buzzltyr wrote: Report this Comment

    People who buy cars do not listen to IPODS, they like to push buttons and listen to the 80s, NFL and CNBC.

    And if you are going to make young drivers your argument, please mention the new 11,000 drivers per day.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 6:01 PM, ab1387 wrote: Report this Comment

    The first poster is absolutely correct. TMF will stick a popular stock into articles which have no relevance so TMF will get clicks. TMF is as irrelevant and useless and narcissitic as Jim Cramer.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 6:32 PM, jnaka94117 wrote: Report this Comment

    TMF spends too much time engaging in self-promotion. Their useless articles can be found in the news section of every ticker symbol listed in Yahoo! Finance. I've almost stopped clicking on their links. As for their service, I've lost too much money on their stock recommendations.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 6:44 PM, eps916 wrote: Report this Comment

    SiriusXM is in dire need of figuring out how to get more value to the customer to keep retention rates high.

    Their asset is content - plain and simple. Outside of Howard Stern and a couple others, there's just not much there. With my 3 subscriptions, I enjoy listening to CNN, CNBC, FoxNews, etc. I don't have 3 subscriptions for the music, since most music is crap these days, anyway. Once Howard leaves, what will be the impact?

  • On October 13, 2008, at 7:18 PM, kriston wrote: Report this Comment

    Sirius are paying Howard Stern $100M per year for a total of $0.5 BILLION DOLLARS in five years.

    On top of all this, Howard Stern isn't even on the media's radar anymore, see this story:

    http://biz.yahoo.com/paidcontent/081012/1_328494_id.html?.v=...

  • On October 13, 2008, at 7:27 PM, frankiecooper wrote: Report this Comment

    you OBVIOUSLY don't listen to stern on satellite. he will NOT retire and will NOT, definitely not, GO BACK TO TERRESTRIAL. terrestrial is dying.

    to assume that ipods or internet radio will take sat's place is an opinion based on the assumption that all people listen to is MUSIC. music is the LEAST listened to thing on MY radio. i listen to stern, cnbc, bloomberg, classic radio, etc...

    can't replace THAT, friend. content is KING and SIRI/XM has cornered the market on THAT.

    another hack job by Rick Aristotle Munarriz (ummmmmmmm.....who?)

    what is it he does again? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • On October 13, 2008, at 7:33 PM, eps916 wrote: Report this Comment

    as much as i wish he would, stern will not be doing this forever. he's getting long in the tooth (and i can say that as a fan that listens every single day). are you waiting for the artie/gary show? come on.

    agreed that music is not what you're paying for here. you can get that via free radio (which sucks, but it's free), or via the ipod or the internet.

    more stern-like or exclusive content will be what it takes to retain my business once he's gone.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 7:44 PM, mailinator wrote: Report this Comment

    Why doesn't Sirius give away receivers and installation like the TV Satellite companies do with the DVR's in exchange for a 2 year contract??

  • On October 13, 2008, at 7:58 PM, frankiecooper wrote: Report this Comment

    eps - i don't expect him to do this forever, but then again - i don't expect ANYONE to do a show forever. i listen every day and i don't understand why you think he is getting "long in the tooth" (a quote from today's show, btw, to describe john stamos...). he is better than ever, imo. let's hope that howard is around for a while (well, he will be for the next year - AT LEAST) and i will re-evaluate my position then. until then, however, i will reap the rewards of having bought so incredibly LOW.

    i'll end with your statement about terrestrial radio - it sucks, but its free. so is herpes.....

  • On October 13, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Fredlee009 wrote: Report this Comment

    You love us, thats why you write articles about Sirius. A few lies in the article I must address first of all.

    1. Pandora is not a viable long term answer, they are a dead company.

    2. Internet radio in the car is messy, and not as consistant. Plus the quality is subpar compared. No content exlusive material...etc...

    3. Stock price is at .51 cents now, not .41.

    4. Fewer radios out there because there will be fewer cars...

    Fewer cars than what? Fewer new cars than sold last year? Yes, but more new cars that have Satellite radio in them than ever, and every year more and more have them that didnt.

    1 car dies that didnt, 3 are born that do.

    So nice try. I wont bash your article if you dont write lies, or present backhanded facts. Your article sucks, your reasons are dumb, and they are not the reasons. Heres my reasons.

    1. Goldman Sachs is manipulating this stock to keep it low.

    2. Sirius is helping them to this fact for many important reasons.

    3. The market is terrible, and they are taking advantage of that.

    4. No news from Sirius to prevent a drop. So it will drop. Lowered guidance didnt help, etc..

    All your reasons are unintelligent, remedial, and inconclusive.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Fredlee009 wrote: Report this Comment

    Do you know why the bulls are mad? Because you focus on this stock more than any stock, DDAHAHHAAAA. Stop writing about it, and well stop posting about it. Deal? I said deal? You there? Exactly...... Tomorrow there will be 4 more from them.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 8:22 PM, eps916 wrote: Report this Comment

    frankie, i hear ya. long in the tooth is a metaphor for getting old, which he is. plus, if i were him, i'd not leave the house with the lovely beth o around! :-)

    his show's still awesome, and i love it.

    i sold my siri position at a loss of .70 a share for around 1.30 a few months back. tiny position bought solely because i like the product. i'd not touch it again for a while, at least until there's some reassuring news from mel. i'd prefer to buy on the way up than the way down.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Fredlee009 wrote: Report this Comment

    Do you really think you could make an intelligible retort to the posters. Of course you cant. Your comments were juvenile and extremely strange. You almost sound like a short. Are you a short?

    Were also mad because the stock is being manipulated by the MM's and banks involved, so I dont want to hear about the market. The market is a joke, its criminal, and I dont want to hear it from you about stock prices being accurate. The market cap on this company is a joke right now.

  • On October 13, 2008, at 11:46 PM, keroyk wrote: Report this Comment

    The fool puts out these articles to force us to log in and give comments for the reason that is apparent so they can get your email address and send the junk that they can not send you with out what they Call SPAM. It also is ironic the Comments they get on how negative they are.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

  • On October 14, 2008, at 4:11 PM, cyberlar wrote: Report this Comment

    I rarely use XM since I have Pandora on the iPhone plugged into my car through the aux jack. Listening to a couple of the spoken word / news channels, but for music, my daze with XM are over.

  • On October 14, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Stopcorruption wrote: Report this Comment

    Rick has been targeting Sirius for a long time. He's very strategic when he places his Sirius bashing articles.

    He tries to cover his tracks by placing a seemingly positive article on a rare occasion on Sirius but he really is bashing it in a backhanded way

    Why does he continue to target this company practically every week?

    I have absolutely no evidence but I often wonder if he's either short selling, a shill for the National Association of Broadcasters or has some other axe to grind.

    Every week he affects my stock price with his negative articles.

    Why would a small cap stock in the middle of such a major banking crisis get all this attention.

    THERE HAS TO BE A HIDDEN AGENDA WHY RICK KEEPS ON ATTACKING SIRIUS WEEK AFTER WEEK. PLEASE SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING. THIS MAKES NO SENSE

  • On October 14, 2008, at 6:35 PM, karaokejb wrote: Report this Comment

    Venom has been found to be very helpful in artritis patients. It also appears that venom is produced by very hot topic to some. Reading other blog sites, and refering to the items that made the hit parade on those sites is a very saavy move on the authors part. Even if his statements are subjective, ya gotta give him credit for pulling the 'chains".

  • On October 14, 2008, at 8:05 PM, sl6209 wrote: Report this Comment

    Kara-- This author knows nothing about pulling chains--except maybe his own...

    OK Rick. I'm back to further refute your nonsensical comments. Esp. with publicly reported words from Mel himself at today's media conference. Did you hear about this Rick? I doubt it.

    In a Q&A with Mediaweek's Katy Bachman at the Dow Jones/Nielsen Media and Money Conference in New York...[10/14/08]

    1. "We've gone from $67 million to $2.4 billion in revenue by the end of the year."

    Hey Rick, where is this fact in any of your articles? Do you think just any company can do this Rick?

    2. As for the debt, Karmazin said: "We're engaged in discussions [our lenders]. I believe we'll be able to refinance it, even in this market."

    Make a note of this Rick. And btw, they have 1B due in '09 not 2B. For some of which they could even use some cash if desired. Rick, while you're spewing your nonsense, please try to be more dilligent.

    3. "When you go out and buy a new car, every car company has committed to putting it [satellite radio] in. Next year, we'll have 50 percent penetration. There are about 17 million new cars produced a year. That number will be 13 million next year. If there are only 12 million cars sold, no one has forecast that, but even if the worst happens, 6 million will leave the assembly line with satellite radio. 50 percent of the people who are offered satellite with their new car, take it. That will get us to $300 million revenue growth even if Detroit has a very bad year. Even in a market where cars are not doing well, we can still feel successful."

    Well, Well Rick. Just as I said to you yesterday. Again, no HOMEWORK on your part. Really man, a 5th grader could have written your article. Are you smarter than a 5th grader Rick? Nope.

    Now Rick on to your pathetic lies.

    Rick: I'm convinced that satellite radio will survive. The market obviously isn't so sure about the immortality of Sirius XM Radio shareholders. After all, antsy creditors may force Sirius into bankruptcy reorganization next year. It would likely wipe out the common-stock investors.

    Even if a terrestrial radio heavy like Clear Channel or CBS (NYSE: CBS) makes a buyout play, it's one that will be considerably cheaper in bankruptcy court.

    REJOINDER: Rick. Are you on drugs? With these statements alone, you show you know nothing about Sat Rad or SIRI. What are your facts behind "creditors are geting antsy" Rick? How do you know this Rick? What are your sources? Oh, you have none. That's what I thought, that's just your uneducated opinion!!! Well, please leep it to yourself huh? And who isn't sick and tired of you being so OBVIOUS Rick? Obviously, you're a loser. See how easy playing the obvious game is? Saying "The market obviously isn't so sure about the immortality of Sirius XM Radio shareholders," is beyond belief Rick! What's your proof here Rick? A stock that has been and continues to be heavily shorted to these levels Rick? You know nothing of this I know but why must you tell such lies to the poor unsuspecting general public. Why can't you say the truth--or "I have no idea why!"? Oh yeah, because you wouldn't know the truth if it smacked you upside the head! DO I need to give you a primer on how shorting affects a stock Rick?

    Now for the piece de resistance from Rick: "Even if a terrestrial radio heavy like Clear Channel or CBS (NYSE: CBS) makes a buyout play, it's one that will be considerably cheaper in bankruptcy court."

    RICK!!!!! Are you on drugs, I must ask again????? Terrestrial radio Rick? Buying out SIRI Rick? Are you on drugs Rick? Mel would NEVER allow that to happen Rick. Read that last sentence a few times and let it sink in Rick. Please, NEVER say something like that again. It's pure delusion on your part and an attempt to make your article seem worthy by name-dropping. Clear Channel only saved their own demise by getting lucky and going private in the 11th hour and CBS Radio is in the toilet--thanks to Howard leaving Rick. C'mon. Besides, terrestrial is SIRI's only competiton Rick--and not much at that. Two different models. In case you hadn't heard, terestrial radio is dying Rick...Maybe SIRI will buy YOU out Rick and let you wash Mels car every day! Wax on wax off Rick!!

    Well thanks Rick for another trash article. I suggest you start looking for another line of work! Thank you.

  • On October 15, 2008, at 5:07 AM, Matt8265 wrote: Report this Comment

    So where were you when TMF recommended XMSR @ 38.00. You guys are hacks.

  • On October 15, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Matt8265 wrote: Report this Comment

    TMF = Click whores.

  • On October 15, 2008, at 1:03 PM, macmann609 wrote: Report this Comment

    I wish Apple would put Sirius XM in the IPhone! I think it would be a great thing for both company`s. Sirius would get a lot more subscribers, Apple would have a new toy to offer!

  • On November 19, 2008, at 6:07 PM, DR1P wrote: Report this Comment

    Honda is offering XM on the '09 Goldwing, It's not just for cars anymore.

    You CAN get Sirius XM on your iPhone, just google iPhone and "satellite radio".

Add your comment.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 751996, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 11/21/2008 3:12:03 PM,

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access to keep reading:

“5 Reasons Why Sirius XM Is at $0.43”

Signing up allows you to comment on articles and on the discussion boards.

It's completely FREE and will take only 10 seconds.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Related Tickers

Sirius XM Radio

SIRI Up! $0.15 +0.01 (+7.14%) 2:49 PM
CAPS Rating:
3744 Outperforms
916 Underperforms
Rate This Stock

Major Indices

S&P 500751.73 -0.09%
DJIA7,552.92+0.01%
NASD1,309.50 -0.50%
Updated: 2:56:45 PM
Sponsored by:

The Motley Poll

What changes are you making to your portfolio?

Sponsored by: